๐Ÿ’ƒ Refactor First, Scale Safely ๐Ÿ•บ

Clarity Beats Cleverness

Good morning, Salesforce Nerds! Those of us in this ecosystem long enough already know โ€ฆ

Legacy Salesforce code almost never fails because itโ€™s slow. It fails because no one understands it well enough to change it safely. ๐Ÿค” 

Thatโ€™s the core lesson behind the refactoring patterns popularized in Refactoring.

Refactoring is not about squeezing milliseconds out of Apex. โŒ 

Itโ€™s about making intent obvious so performance, scale, and reliability can follow without fear. โœ… 

On a governor-limited platform, this distinction matters.

Refactoring is how teams modernize Apex incrementally without rewrites, regressions, or high-risk releases.

Itโ€™s how brittle triggers evolve into durable services. ๐Ÿ’ช 

And itโ€™s how โ€œjust one more ifโ€ stops becoming a permanent architecture decision.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SMALL STEPS, SAFE CHANGE

REFACTOR INCREMENTALLY

Refactoring is a risk-managed, incremental practice.

You are not redesigning the system. ๐Ÿšซ You are reshaping it while keeping behavior identical. ๐Ÿงฉ 

In Salesforce terms, that usually means:

  • Tests pass before and after.

  • No schema changes required.

  • No new business logic introduced.

  • Same data outcomes, same side effects.

A common starting point is the Extract Method.

Legacy Apex tends to pack querying, branching, and mutation into one dense block. ๐Ÿ˜ฐ 

Before:

if (opp.StageName == 'Closed Won' && opp.Amount > 50000 &&
    opp.Account.Industry != 'Education') {
    // query users
    // calculate commission
    // insert records
}

After:

if (isEligibleForCommission(opp)) {
    awardCommission(opp);
}

Nothing is faster yet. Nothing is optimized. But intent is now explicit. ๐Ÿง  

And explicit intent is what enables safe change later.

UNDERSTAND BEFORE OPTIMIZING

EXTRACT INTENT FIRST

One of the most practical refactoring lessons is this: you canโ€™t optimize what you canโ€™t explain. ๐Ÿ’ฏ 

Salesforce teams often chase performance fixes inside unreadable logic.

Thatโ€™s backwards. The most valuable refactors extract why before touching how. ๐Ÿ‘ˆ๏ธ 

Common intent-revealing refactors include:

Before:

for (Opportunity o : opps) {
    if (o.StageName == 'Closed Won' && o.Amount > 10000 &&
        o.CloseDate <= Date.today().addDays(7)) {
        total += o.Amount * 0.1;
    }
}

After:

for (Opportunity o : opps) {
    if (isCommissionable(o)) {
        total += calculateCommission(o);
    }
}

Now optimization becomes obvious.

Calculations can move out of loops. Eligibility can be cached. Queries can be consolidated. ๐Ÿ˜‹ 

Governor-safe performance emerges because the code finally says what it means.

POLYMORPHISM BEATS BRANCHING

REPLACE CONDITIONALS CLEANLY

Salesforce codebases accumulate conditionals fast. ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ 

Record types, picklists, statuses, regions. Each new rule adds another if/else.

This is where Replace Conditional with Polymorphism delivers immediate value. ๐Ÿ’ฐ๏ธ 

Before:

if (acct.Type == 'Customer') {
    applyCustomerRules(acct);
} else if (acct.Type == 'Partner') {
    applyPartnerRules(acct);
} else if (acct.Type == 'Prospect') {
    applyProspectRules(acct);
}

After:

AccountRules rules = AccountRulesFactory.forType(acct.Type);
rules.apply(acct);

Each implementation owns its logic, queries, and limit footprint. Adding a new type no longer risks breaking existing behavior. ๐ŸŽ‰ 

More importantly, governor impact becomes localized instead of scattered across branches.

This refactor doesnโ€™t just improve readability. ๐Ÿ“ˆ It directly reduces risk in bulk and async contexts.

PUT LOGIC WHERE IT BELONGS

FIX OWNERSHIP BOUNDARIES

Another widely used refactoring is Move Method. In Salesforce, misplaced logic is a quiet scalability killer. ๐Ÿคก 

Triggers doing calculations. ๐Ÿ˜ก 

Services mutating unrelated objects. ๐Ÿซข 

Invocable Apex that โ€œknows everything.โ€ ๐Ÿ˜ฌ 

Before:

// OpportunityService
public static void updateAccountMetrics(Opportunity opp) {
    Account a = [SELECT Id, Score__c FROM Account WHERE Id = :opp.AccountId];
    a.Score__c += opp.Amount;
    update a;
}

After:

// AccountService
public static void applyOpportunityImpact(Account a, Opportunity opp) {
    a.Score__c += opp.Amount;
}

Ownership is now clear. DML can be consolidated.

Flow can orchestrate without embedding business logic. Async strategies become trivial. ๐Ÿš€ 

Clear boundaries reduce coupling, which directly reduces accidental governor consumption.

This is also where Flow shines as an orchestration layer while Apex services execute business rules. ๐Ÿง  

LONGEVITY OVER HEROICS

REFACTORING THAT SCALES

Letโ€™s end with a few myths worth retiring. ๐ŸŽฏ 

โŒ Refactoring does not slow delivery. Unclear code does.

โŒ Refactoring is not rewriting. If behavior changes, it isnโ€™t refactoring.

โŒ Optimization does not come first. Understanding does.

In Salesforce, refactoring is how teams earn the right to scale. Itโ€™s how Apex becomes bulk-safe, Flow becomes orchestration, and automation survives growth instead of fighting it.

These patterns endure because they work. ๐Ÿ’ฏ 

Clean code doesnโ€™t just read better. It survives longer, scales further, and fails less often. โœจ 

SOUL FOOD

Todayโ€™s Principle

"Iโ€™m not a great programmer; Iโ€™m just a good programmer with great habits."

Martin Fowler

and now....Salesforce Memes

What did you think about today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.